This page has been accessed times since 01/03/97
Heat stability: group I viruses are not inactivated by heating at 50�C for 1h as is the case with true enteroviruses.
Effect of ions: normally enteroviruses are protected from inactivation at 50�C by the presence of 1M MgCl2. Group I viruses when heated at 50�C in the presence of halide ions are inactivated. In this they resemble encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) which is heat-inactivated when in the presence of halide ions but between certain pHs.
Formaldehyde sensitivity: Treatment with 0.1% formaldehyde for 5-7 days at 37�C has been used to inactivate bovine enteroviruses prior to raising type specific reference antisera (Knowles and Barnett, 1985). This same treatment affects the capsid structure of group I PEVs (but not group II or group III viruses); the virions have an lowered Sverberg coefficient. A similar effect has been shown to occur with poliovirus but with formaldehyde concentrations about 100-fold higher (Wouters et al., 1973). The poliovirus particles appeared swollen when observed by EM.
Growth properties/CPE: The time taken for the appearance of CPE following inoculation of 100 TCD50 is 4-5 days. This is generally slower than most enteroviruses. The PEV group I CPE is not like that of PEV group II or PEV group III or other enteroviruses.
RT-PCR: Using an enterovirus group-specific RT-PCR (in the 5' NCR) we were able to amplify and sequence a genome fragment from a number of animal enteroviruses, including human, bovine and ovine enteroviruses and PEV-8, PEV-9 and PEV-10; however, the remaining PEVs (group I) were negative (F. Lin, D.K.J. Mackay and N.J. Knowles, unpublished data).
Auerbach, J., Prager, D., Neuhaus, S., Loss, U. and Witte, K.H. (1994). Grouping of porcine enteroviruses by indirect immunofluorescence and description of two new serotypes. J. Vet. Med. B. 41: 277-282.
Dunne, H.W., Wang, J.T. and Ammerman, E.H. (1971). Further studies on the classification of North American porcine enteroviruses: A comparison with European and Japanese strains. Infection and Immunity 4: 619-631.
Honda, E., Kimata, A., Hattori, I., Kumagai, T., Tsuda, T. and Tokui, T. (1990). A serological comparison of 4 Japanese isolates of porcine enteroviruses with the international reference strains. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science 52: 49-54.
Kadoi, K., Kobori, S. and Morimoto, T. (1970). Studies on swine enteroviruses: Japanese 6th serotype and relationship between heat susceptibility and cytopathic effects. Japanese Journal of Microbiology 14: 111-121.
Knowles, N.J. and Barnett, I.T.R. (1985). A serological classification of bovine enteroviruses. Archives of Virology 83: 141-155.
Knowles, N.J. and Buckley, L.S. (1980). Differentiation of porcine enterovirus serotypes by complement fixation. Research in Veterinary Science 29: 113-115.
Knowles, N.J., Buckley, L.S. and Pereira, H.G. (1979). Classification of porcine enteroviruses by antigenic analysis and cytopathic effects in tissue culture: description of 3 new serotypes. Archives of Virology 62: 201-208.
Rasmussen, P.G. (1969): A study of enterovirus strains in Danish pigs. III. Division of enterovirus strains into two groups based on varying cytopathogenic effect, thermoresistance (50�C) and pH stability (pH 2.2). Nord. Vet-Med. 21: 177-187.
Wouters, M., Miller, A.O.A. and Fenwick, M.L. (1973). Distortion of poliovirus particles by fixation with formaldehyde. Journal of General Virology 18: 211- 214.
Zoletto, R. (1965). Differential characteristics of swine enteroviruses. Veterinaria Italiana 16: 13-20.
Zoletto, R., Kadoi, K., Turilli, C., Cancelloti, F. and Stilas, B. (1974). Cytopathic effect and physicochemical characteristics of swine vesicular disease virus and its relationship with other swine enteroviruses. 3rd International Congress (IPVS), Lyon, France, June 12-14.